This weekend, a group of Bitcoin developers decided your block space belongs to them.
They call it BIP-110 — the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." Sounds boring. Here’s what it actually is: a one-year consensus-level ban on storing anything in a Bitcoin transaction that isn’t "financial data." Pictures. Text. Ordinals inscriptions. All of it, banned.
Their excuse? "Congestion." "Costs." "Protecting Bitcoin’s purpose."
Translation: we don’t like what you’re doing with your own block space, so we’re going to force you to stop.
The "civil war" lasted one day
On Saturday, at block 961,632, the enforcers flipped the switch. Nodes running BIP-110 began rejecting any block that didn’t signal support. The moment of truth — the moment the "guardians" would prove the network wanted their change.
It did not go well.
The breakaway chain mined TWO blocks in eight hours. Then it stalled. The main network raced 48 blocks ahead while the "new Bitcoin" sat there gasping.
Here’s the mechanical reality the true believers ignored: the fork inherited Bitcoin’s full mining difficulty with a fraction of the hashpower. Its next difficulty adjustment is 350 days away. The main chain’s? Fourteen days. This isn’t a rebellion — it’s a coma with a heartbeat monitor.
The numbers that killed the crusade
Miner support for BIP-110: 2.53%. The threshold to activate without a split: 55%.
Two point five three percent. The network looked at the proposal, shrugged, and went about its business.
Even the fork coins are a trap. Both chains accept identical transactions — so anyone trying to dump their fork coins can get the sale rebroadcast on the main chain and watch the buyer walk away with real BTC. Novel attack, same old story: when you gamble on a minority chain, you’re the exit liquidity.
CoinDesk called the whole episode "free-market capitalism in purest form." They’re right. Bitcoin has no king, no CEO, no parliament. You cannot force a consensus change on a network that doesn’t want it. Two percent of the network screaming at the other ninety-eight isn’t a revolution — it’s a tantrum.
The lesson the censors refuse to learn
They’re already talking about a hard-fork fallback. About "UASF." About pushing ahead anyway. They learned nothing from watching their crusade die in a weekend.
And here’s the thing they still don’t get: if you don’t like Ordinals, don’t buy them. That’s how a free market works. Nobody asked for a committee to decide which transactions are "legitimate" — least of all one with 2.53% support.
Bitcoin is money. It’s also permissionless. You don’t get to pick one.
Source: CoinDesk · Cointelegraph · NostrMag
Coupon: LOVEISBITCOIN
Get your Bitcoin with Bull Bitcoin: https://loveisbitcoin.com/bull
So here’s the question: if a handful of "purists" can’t drag even 3% of the network into their crusade, why should anyone believe they get to decide what Bitcoin is for — and whose block space are they coming for next, yours?
